Feasibility of the United States surpassing China within production manufacturing

Introduction

The United States has always managed to overcome and adapt to many problems that have arisen. Currently, there is a major problem; manufacturing work in the United States is going overseas and China is the main destination. This is making China be the biggest competitor to the United States within the category of production manufacturing. Production manufacturing facilities across the United States are struggling to stay afloat and desperately need relief. More often than not the only option for these facilities is to relocate to China. Within China, there are less strict regulations and the cost to operate is much lower due to several varying reasons. These reasons will be discussed throughout this paper. It is crucial that the United States should be able to stop such a shift and attract new production manufacturing facilities. The effects of losing these valuable facilities are clear.

In 1990, the percentage of men who worked a full year with only a high school degree was 76%. In 2013, this percentage dropped to 68% (Bonvillian 27). Manufacturing is a field that offers competitive pay and learning opportunities without a college education. It is clear that the loss of manufacturing facilities within the United States has a huge impact on the economy.

Currently, it seems to be a movement causing companies to source from China, and to solve this problem, when there is already such momentum, seems to be a daunting task. However, if the right approaches are taken on time, results can be seen in the near future. A change will not take place overnight, but with a steady influence and unrelenting application of different techniques, results can be expected.

In order for the United States to dominate within production manufacturing, the following techniques should be followed:

·         Incorporate Lean Manufacturing,
·         Invest in technological advancements, and
·         Create technical education opportunities for young individuals.

Incorporating these ideas at a national level would not be an easy task. However, statistics show clearly that a change is needed. The purpose of this report is to inform individuals of the economic state of the United States within production manufacturing, to present ideas for creating a considerable turnaround, and to determine the feasibility of the United States surpassing China within production manufacturing. Information within this report will be gathered from reliable sources and presented in a clear and concise manner utilizing the Modern Language Association format.


Data Section

Manufacturing within the United States
Manufacturing jobs in the United States continued to decline for 12 years from 1997 to 2009 at a stretch (Hemphill et al 4). This fact alone shows that something needs to change. Between the years of 2000 and 2010, manufacturing within the United States declined severely within 4 main categories: employment, investment, output, and productivity (Bonvillian 31-32).

Employment
Approximately 50 years ago, manufacturing had a huge share of the United States gross domestic product (GDP). It constituted approximately 27% of total GDP. A number of individuals working in this field remained constant at around 17 million from 1965 to 2000. But, from 2000 to 2010, this number decreased drastically and dropped to around 12 million. This has a huge impact on manufacturing in the United States.

Investment
In 2000, total investment in manufacturing declined by 1.8%. This happened for the first time since data collection started in the 1940’s. This could be taken as a significant indication of the decline in manufacturing.

Output
From 2003 to 2007, manufacturing output grew by only 0.5%. However, from the years 2007 to 2009, the United States manufacturing output witnessed a staggering fall by 10.3%. Manufacturing output has remained relatively flat from 2009 until recent years. 

Productivity
Production and output are tied together. Along with output, production fell sharply after 2007. The stagnation of output has a huge influence on production. Suzanne Berger noted that economists have thought manufacturing is comparable to agriculture, where productivity allows even a smaller workforce to create a greater output. She also noted that this is simply incorrect (Bonvillian 32).

The inevitable myth
It has been stated that advancement in the economy causes an unavoidable decline in manufacturing and manufacturing jobs available within a nation. This can be concluded as a myth with facts to support the claim. Germany is a prime example; with 20% of total employment in the manufacturing sector, German workers within the manufacturing sector are paid much higher than those of the United States. Germany plays a major role in global manufacturing trade, including trade with China. Accomplishing this with the undeniable fact that Germany faces some of the same challenges as the United States such as stricter regulations and employment costs while also competing with China proves that relocating to China is not an essential choice for production manufacturers (Bonvillian 33).

Why relocate to China
It is undeniable that manufacturing companies that have started in the United States sometimes relocate to China. There are several reasons behind this fact, but essentially it comes down to only one reason - profit  It is profit that motivates a company to relocate its facilities. However, it only makes sense to do what will yield the greatest profit. The factors that make China a profitable nation to establish a manufacturing company are mercantilism, Chinese innovation, and unregulated work conditions.

Mercantilism
It is widely assumed that China applies mercantilism policies. This means that the exchange rates that China imposes on currency create an indirect tariff as great as 20-40% of the value of the import. In order for a company to have a market within China, it is almost essential to be established within China if a profit is to be expected. Congress members within the United States have asked the Department of Treasury to declare China a currency manipulator to no avail. If China continues to manipulate currency to this extreme point, it is difficult for American manufacturing facilities to compete within China (Beretta and Iannini 118).

Chinese innovation
The Chinese are always searching for new ways to remain competitive. Every year the country spends upwards to 200 billion dollars on research. The only country that invests more than this is the United States. Chinese innovation can be broken down into four categories, as shown below (Roth et al).

Customer focused innovation
Efficiency driven innovation
Engineering based innovation
Science based innovation
China benefits from the size of the market. Creating huge potential in even small markets. China utilizes feedback to create the best possible product.
China can successfully manage the pressure to improve performance with large demands but struggles with more advanced manufacturing.
China has advantageous   infrastructures to assist in manufacturing. She claims 41% of global railroad revenues.
China utilizes the huge market to speed up and industrialize data collection. This will fuel growth and competitiveness.

Unregulated work conditions
In 2011, Chinese CO2 emissions accounted for more than 25% of total emissions in the whole world (Cheng et al 1). CO2 emission regulation from China is weaker than most developed countries (Cheng et al 7). Manufacturing facilities are able to operate within China without costly emission regulation allowing for a greater profit. Currently, China is incorporating stricter regulation for emissions and plans to reduce emissions by up to 40% by 2020. This removal of this incentive to manufacture in China could result in a shift of certain manufacturing facilities to different nations. The cost to change locations could prove to be a barrier though, and further incentives will be needed to draw manufacturing facilities outside of China.


Solution options

Lean Manufacturing
Lean Manufacturing is a company’s effort to eliminate waste in a production process (Connaughton). Waste before Lean Manufacturing can be broken down into 8 main categories; overproduction, waiting, unnecessary motion, processing, inventory, processing failures, and space.

Although any tool that reduces waste within the production process can be considered part of the Lean Manufacturing process, five major tools are most commonly used. Those are cellular manufacturing, just-in-time, kaizen, kanban, and poka-yoke (Connaughton).

Lean Manufacturing can reduce waste within any manufacturing facility. Utilization of these practices increases profit.

Invest in technological advancements
The United States needs to have advantages that China does not have. One of these advantages includes technology. The United States has the world’s strongest early stage innovation system (Bonvillian 34). Although the United States has not invested in what has turned out to be an important innovation stage; production.

By innovating here and producing there the United States can utilize the full spectrum of economic gains from having innovations in different categories.

Education opportunities
In order for any company to succeed, there must be reliable and resourceful employees. More than 75% of manufacturers within the United States report a shortage of skilled workers. To add to the worse, a large portion of the workforce within manufacturing is nearing retirement. Besides, manufacturing has a negative image among the young generation. 2.7 million manufacturing workers are expected to retire and 700 thousand jobs are expected to be created in the next 10 years (Meinert 46). The United States needs to invest in more technical career centers to educate young individuals to fill up those positions in the manufacturing sector. Kids, nowadays, do not get enough exposure to the idea of a technical education.

Solutions can be broken down and summarized into three categories.

Lean Manufacturing
Technological advancements
Education opportunities
To introduce new practices to reduce waste within manufacturing facilities across the United States
To invest in new technology in order to give the United States the advantages that China does not have
To create enough study opportunities for young individuals so that they can be introduced to the manufacturing sector



Conclusion
Summary of findings
China has a huge workforce within the manufacturing sector that accounts for a large portion of their economy. Within the United States, manufacturing is still a large portion of the economy although the workforce is decreasing as young individuals lose interest in the manufacturing sector. Manufacturing within the United States fell sharply from 2000 to 2010, while manufacturing within China grew.

Interpretations of findings
Although the United States may be able to outperform China with more advanced manufacturing practices, the United States will not be able to compete with China within production manufacturing due to the fact that China has already established such a dominance within the category. Regardless of the United States surpassing China, the solution options should be followed closely.

Recommendations
In order to cut costs and increase profit, manufacturing facilities within the United States need to adopt Lean Manufacturing. The waste that could be prevented from utilizing these techniques could be enough to keep a company afloat and jobs within America. Moreover, it is important to invest in new technologies that can benefit the manufacturing process in any way, whether it be an improved product or a shorter run time. And finally, creating a secure future for manufacturing by creating education opportunities is important.


References

Beretta, Silvio, and Giusseppe Iannini. “CHINA: A CASE OF ‘MERCANTILISM’ IN A
BACKWARD COUNTRY?” European Scientific Journal 1.1857- 7431 (2014): 118
127. Web.

Bonvillian, William B. "Donald Trump's Voters And The Decline Of American
Manufacturing." Issues In Science & Technology 32.4 (2016): 27. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 14 July 2016.

Cheng, Huifang, Fangmin Li, and Qinfeng Mao. "The Empirical Analysis On The Influence Of CO2 Emission Regulation On The Export Transformation Of Chinese Manufacturing        Industries." Journal Of Coastal Research 73.(2015): 209-215. Computers & Applied Sciences Complete. Web. 15 July 2016.

Connaughton, Sue Ann. "Lean Manufacturing." Research Starters: Business (Online
Edition) (2015): Research Starters. Web. 15 July 2016.

Hemphill, Thomas A., Mark J. Perry, and MaryAnne M. Gobble. "Supporting Advanced
Manufacturing In The United States." Research Technology Management 55.3 (2012):
3. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 14 July 2016.

Meinert, Dori. "Manufacturing Magnets." HR Magazine 60.9 (2015): 44. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 16 July 2016.

Roth, Erik, Jeongmin Seong, and Jonathan Woetzel. "Gauging The Strength Of Chinese
Innovation." Mckinsey Quarterly 4 (2015): 68-73. Business Source Complete. Web. 15 July 2016.

Shirley Ye, Sheng, and Yan Ma. "China Vs. The United States: Market Connections And Trade Relations." International Journal Of China Marketing 2.1 (2011): 45-57. Business Source Complete. Web. 12 July 2016.